All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Ha Phan
YesNo
Nicholas Finan
YesNo
Ritesh Tandon
YesNo
Ethan Agarwal
YesNo
Ro Khanna
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.16 04:26 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
California's 17th district uses a 'Top-Two' primary system where the top two candidates advance regardless of party. Incumbent Ro Khanna (D) is a lock for the first spot (Fair Value 99c). The race for the second spot is between Ethan Agarwal (D), Ritesh Tandon (R), and Ha Phan (R). Ethan Agarwal is running a well-funded campaign with significant backing from Silicon Valley tech elites (e.g., Garry Tan), positioning himself as a moderate reformer. The Republican vote faces a severe split: Ritesh Tandon is a perennial candidate with damaged credibility (ran as a Democrat in 2024 and lost, now back to R), while Ha Phan attracts conservative votes. Given Agarwal's resources and the GOP fracture, his chance of advancing is significantly undervalued. Under Top-Two rules, the sum of fair values across all candidates must equal 200.
Sign up to view more information
Movers
March 14, 2026 - March 15, 2026, Ritesh Tandon's price rose from 19c to 24c, likely due to speculation that he can consolidate the GOP vote despite his history of party-switching.
March 12, 2026 - March 15, 2026, Ro Khanna's price dropped abnormally from 99c to 90c. This is not fundamental (he is a lock) but likely due to liquidity constraints or market pricing inefficiencies in the multi-outcome pool, deepening the arbitrage opportunity.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. The market prices Ritesh Tandon (24c) higher than Ethan Agarwal (19.5c). However, political context shows Tandon is a perennial candidate who flipped to Democrat in 2024 (and lost badly) before flipping back to Republican, damaging his credibility. Conversely, Agarwal has secured high-profile backing from Silicon Valley VCs (e.g., Chamath Palihapitiya) and represents a well-funded challenge. Agarwal's probability of advancing should be fundamentally higher than Tandon's.
