PMElections|$2.2m Vol|
time229 days 6 hrs

California Governor Election Winner - AI Odds Analysis

All Outcomes
Market Price
AI Fair Value
Value Edge
Tom Steyer
YesNo
Eric Swalwell
YesNo
Matt Mahan
YesNo
Steve Hilton
YesNo
Elaine Culotti
YesNo
Katie Porter
YesNo
Chad Bianco
YesNo
Betty Yee
YesNo
Rick Caruso
YesNo
Antonio Villaraigosa
YesNo
Xavier Becerra
YesNo
Toni Atkins
YesNo
Eleni Kounalakis
YesNo
Stephen Cloobeck
YesNo
Michael Younger
YesNo
Butch Ware
YesNo
Tony Thurmond
YesNo
Alex Padilla
YesNo
Leo Zacky
YesNo
Kyle Langford
YesNo
Daniel Mercuri
YesNo
Nicole Shanahan
YesNo
Kamala Harris
YesNo
LOGO

AI Insights:

17 hours ago Updated
Fair Value Reasoning:
The fundamental logic of the CA Governor race hinges on the 'Deep Blue State Primary' mechanics. California uses a Top-2 jungle primary where only the top two finishers advance to November, regardless of party. While Republicans (Steve Hilton, Chad Bianco) are polling well in the primary (e.g., Hilton at 13% in Emerson polls) due to consolidated GOP support, their probability of winning the General Election in November is negligible (<5%) given the Democratic voter registration advantage. The market's combined pricing of ~14c for GOP candidates conflates the odds of 'advancing' with 'winning'. On the Democratic side, Eric Swalwell (17%) has established a polling lead; as the Democratic frontrunner, his general election win probability is high, justifying a ~52c valuation. Tom Steyer (11-13%), with unlimited self-funding and solid polling, is significantly undervalued at 8c; his fair value is likely >20c. Elaine Culotti, a fringe NPP candidate with no polling traction, is in a massive bubble at 12c with no fundamental basis.

Sign up to view more information

Arbitrage|Low Risk

Arbitrage Plan:

Buy 'No' on Elaine Culotti

Plan Description:

Elaine Culotti's price has exhibited a highly abnormal spike (from <1c to 12.65c), which completely diverges from all major polling (Emerson, PPIC, Berkeley) where she is either unlisted or polling negligibly. This is likely due to illiquidity or manipulation. As an NPP candidate with low name recognition, her win probability is virtually zero. Buying 'No' costs ~87.35c for a 100c payout, offering a ~14.5% absolute return. This is a high-confidence trade. Additionally, buying 'No' on Steve Hilton is a strong play, betting against a Republican winning the CA General Election.

Sign up to view more information

Arbitrage: 12¢
|
Annualized yield: 20.1%
Movers
Mar 16, 2026 - Mar 17, 2026, Elaine Culotti's price surged irrationally from 0.7c to 12.65c. There is no fundamental news or polling data to support this move, suggesting potential manipulation or a 'fat finger' error, momentarily valuing her higher than major contenders like Tom Steyer and Katie Porter. Mar 15, 2026 - Mar 16, 2026, Chad Bianco experienced high volatility, spiking to 10.35c before crashing back to 4.35c, reflecting market uncertainty regarding his standing against Steve Hilton within the consolidated Republican bracket.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. 1. **Elaine Culotti**: Market pricing (12.65c) implies a >12% win probability, which is completely detached from reality (where she is a fringe candidate with near-zero chance). 2. **GOP Premium**: The market prices Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco relatively high (combined ~14c). While this aligns with primary polls showing GOP candidates leading due to consolidated support, it starkly contradicts historical General Election probabilities in California, where a Republican win is statistically unlikely. Participants are confusing 'advancing from primary' with 'winning the election'.

Support

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is PolyPredict AI and how can I access it?
2. How does the AI determine the "Fair Value"?
3. What makes the "Arbitrage Plans" unique?
4. What is the difference between Event and Live Markets?
5. Is there a free trial for the Pro plan?
6. Can I use PolyPredict AI on Telegram?

The All-in-One AI Copilot for Prediction Markets