Geopolitics|$129.9k Vol|
103 days 5 hrsGustavo Petro out as leader of Colombia by...? - AI Odds Analysis
All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
December 31
YesNo
June 30
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.13 12:04 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Current date is March 13, 2026. The Colombian presidential election is imminent (May), and the constitutional transfer of power is set for August 7. The 'June 30' option requires Petro to be removed before his term concludes; this is highly unlikely given the lack of impeachment momentum and the shift of political focus to the upcoming election (Fair Value ~2c). The 'December 31' option covers his scheduled departure on August 7. The current price of 94 cents implies a ~6% risk that he refuses to leave or disrupts the constitutional order. Given Colombia's mature democratic institutions and military stance, this tail risk is overpriced. The overwhelming base case is an orderly transfer of power, placing fair value closer to 98 cents.
Sign up to view more information
Exotics
This is a geopolitical prediction regarding the stability of a specific head of state. While not absurd (instability in Latin American politics is not rare), it is a niche political risk market compared to mainstream US elections or sports. The political pressure and scandals facing Gustavo Petro make this a grounded question rather than pure fantasy, but it remains somewhat exotic for a general audience.
Hedging
GXG
ECO
This event has a direct and significant impact on Colombian assets. Petro has pursued anti-oil exploration policies; his removal would generally be viewed as a market-friendly signal, likely boosting Colombian ETFs (e.g., GXG) and major energy companies like Ecopetrol (ECO) significantly. While Colombia is an oil producer, a leadership change has a limited impact on global crude prices (Score 2) compared to local assets. If the removal is violent or chaotic, it might trigger minor risk-off sentiment, but the impact on global macro assets like DXY is negligible.
Divergence
While not a drastic conflict, a mild divergence exists. The market price (Dec 31 No @ 6c) implies a 6% probability that Petro retains power unconstitutionally after his term ends. However, mainstream political analysis and media consensus expect the electoral process to proceed constitutionally, with no imminent signs of institutional collapse. The market appears to be pricing in an excessive risk premium for 'LatAm political uncertainty,' whereas the realistic political environment suggests this tail risk is likely below 1%.
