The market resolution relies entirely on Polymarket's specific tracker. The detailed rules regarding the exclusion of replies and the ~5-minute capture window for deleted posts create moderate risk, as users' manual counts may easily diverge from the tracker's data.

This is a highly entertaining and novelty market. Aside from specific participants closely monitoring crypto social dynamics, the general public would not think about or care exactly how many times a specific individual tweets in a given week.

April 5, 2026 - April 6, 2026, the price of the '20-39' option trended upwards from 52c to 77c, as CZ's posting pace steadily pointed towards this range over time, strengthening market confidence. April 3, 2026, 06:10 - April 4, 2026, 09:20, the price of the '20-39' option surged steadily from 13c to 75.5c, while the '<20' option plummeted from 85c to 17c. This was due to a noticeable increase in CZ's actual posting volume during this period, causing the market to rapidly adjust its expectations for his total post count into a higher bracket. April 3, 2026, 06:10 - April 3, 2026, 20:20, the price of the '40-59' option spiked from 1.5c to 19.6c before pulling back, as a short-term burst in posting frequency triggered market speculation that the total could exceed 40.

Betting on the specific weekly social media posting frequency of a politician is a classic novelty market. While not as mainstream as predicting election outcomes, it is quite common and entertaining within specific crypto prediction trading communities.

April 5, 2026 - April 7, 2026, the Yes price for the 60-79 bracket dropped significantly from 32.75c to 17.65c. The reason is a sudden acceleration in posting frequency, sharply reducing the likelihood of a final count below 80. April 4, 2026 - April 7, 2026, the Yes price for the 80-99 bracket surged from 37.5c to 51.5c. The reason is the stabilization of the posting pace, significantly increasing the probability of the total falling into this range. April 3, 2026 - April 6, 2026, the Yes price for the 100-119 bracket plummeted from 49.5c to 19.5c before rebounding to 25.5c. The initial drop was due to daily post volumes failing to support high expectations, while the rebound reflects a recent recovery in posting pace. April 3, 2026 - April 5, 2026, the Yes price for the 60-79 bracket surged from 6.9c to 32.7c, as daily post volume slightly below the historical peak average mathematically increased the probability of the final total landing in this lower-normal bracket. March 31, 2026 - April 3, 2026, the Yes prices for the 120-139, 140-159, and 40-59 brackets plummeted by over 15c each. The reason is that as the tracking period approached, market forecasting models priced out extreme posting frequencies, causing expectations to rapidly converge into the standard 60-119 mean range.

The rules strictly define eligible post types, excluding normal replies but including those on the main feed. Deleted posts also count if captured within 5 minutes. Moreover, resolution heavily relies on a specific third-party tracker (Polymarket X Tracker), which could lead to disputes if it malfunctions or misses posts.

Predicting the exact number of tweets from the official White House account in a specific week is a highly niche and trivial novelty market. Most people would never think about or track this metric before seeing the question.

April 3, 2026 - April 6, 2026: The price of the '180-199' option plummeted from 41.5c to 10.5c (currently at 18.5c), the '160-179' option dropped from 46.5c to 20.5c (currently 25.5c), and the '140-159' option dropped from 48c to 13c (currently 23.5c). Additionally, the '120-139' option experienced massive volatility, crashing from 47.3c to 3.6c before recovering to 13c. This was caused by actual posting data over the weekend showing a slower pace, which led the market to adjust its projection for the 7-day total downwards, pulling back probabilities from the highest brackets. April 3, 2026 - April 5, 2026: The '120-139' option plummeted from 47.35c to 6.6c, the '140-159' option dropped from 48c to 18c, the '180-199' option fluctuated from 20.5c to 23.5c, and the '160-179' option dropped from 46.5c to 35c. This occurred because, as the observation period progressed, initial data on posting pace caused the market to continuously revise expectations for the final total, ruling out some lower and excessively high brackets. April 1, 2026 - April 3, 2026: The price of the '180-199' option surged from 20.5c to 41.5c (before settling at 31.5c), the '160-179' option dropped from 46.5c to 32c, and the '200+' option surged from 6.5c to 30.5c (settling at 22c). This is due to the market significantly raising its expectations for the White House account's posting frequency as the observation period approached, anticipating a higher daily average. March 31, 2026 - April 1, 2026: The 'yes' prices for lower posting brackets (e.g., '<20', '40-59', '60-79', '80-99') all plummeted drastically (by over 20c). This occurred because the market ruled out the possibility of extremely low posting frequencies, and liquidity concentrated in the higher posting brackets.

Moderate rule risk exists. The rules exclude regular replies but include main feed replies, making manual verification difficult. Furthermore, deleted posts must survive ~5 minutes to be captured, and the heavy reliance on a specific third-party tracker could cause discrepancies with the public's intuitive count.

Highly exotic market. Predicting the exact number of social media posts a specific individual makes in a given week is not a mainstream topic; it is an entertainment-driven speculation tailored for crypto prediction market users.

April 4, 2026 - April 7, 2026, the price of '240-259' surged from 13.5c to 24.5c, as the steady increase in tweet volume made the market more confident that the final count would fall into this range. April 3, 2026 - April 6, 2026, the price of '240-259' surged from 12.5c to 24.5c, as the steady increase in tweet volume further boosted the certainty of falling into this range. April 5, 2026 - April 6, 2026, the price of '200-219' plummeted from 11.3c to 5.9c, as the likelihood of falling into this lower bracket is decreasing with the steady accumulation of tweets. April 3, 2026 - April 6, 2026, the price of '300-319' plummeted from 32.5c to 5.5c, as the posting frequency significantly slowed down after the initial surge, prompting traders to continuously revise their final count expectations downward based on the updated pace. April 3, 2026 - April 3, 2026, the price of '300-319' surged from 12.5c to 32.5c, because the tracking period had just started and Musk exhibited a sudden burst of tweeting activity, prompting traders to sharply revise their final count projections upwards.