April 21, 2026 - April 24, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' plunged from 58.5c to 38c. The reason is that previous rumors of a diplomatic breakthrough regarding Iran halting all enrichment were unverified, causing extreme market optimism to fade rapidly as investors reassessed the immense political hurdles of achieving the extremely high threshold of ending 'ALL' enrichment activities.
April 13, 2026 - April 17, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' surged from 20.5c to 64.5c, driven by breaking diplomatic news suggesting Iran might have agreed to completely halt uranium enrichment in intensive recent talks in exchange for unprecedented sanctions relief, leading to extreme market optimism.
April 7, 2026 - April 8, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' surged from 16c to 27.5c, driven by fresh rumors of diplomatic back-channel contacts suggesting Iran might have discussed a temporary full halt to uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief.
March 31, 2026 - April 3, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' fell from 27.5c to 15c. The reason is that as the market cooled down from earlier rumors, traders gradually realized the extremely high standard required by the rules ('end ALL uranium enrichment'), making the likelihood of such an agreement negligible, which led to fading optimism.
March 8, 2026 - March 13, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' drifted down from 34c to 23.5c. This decline followed the clarification of the post-strike landscape, where Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a defiant statement on March 8 rejecting any halt to enrichment, fading the optimism that had built up around earlier rumors of a 'suspension offer'.
March 5, 2026 - March 6, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' surged from 17.5c to 38c, driven by media leaks (e.g., NYT) that Iran had proposed 'suspending enrichment for 3-5 years' in Geneva talks, which the market prematurely priced as an imminent deal.