Climate & Science|$574.7k Vol|
377 days 7 hrsHow many large volcano eruptions (VEI ≥4) in 2026? - AI Odds Analysis
All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
0
YesNo
1
YesNo
3
YesNo
2
YesNo
4
YesNo
5+
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.11 23:47 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
As of March 11, 2026, no VEI 4 eruptions have been confirmed. With approximately 19% of the year (70 days) elapsed, the Poisson distribution model—based on a long-term average of 0.7 eruptions/year—shows the expected value (Lambda) for the remainder of the year dropping to ~0.57. Consequently, the probability of finishing the year with '0' eruptions rises to ~57% (e^-0.57), while the probability of '1' total eruption drops to ~32%. Currently, market pricing is inverted, with '1' (48c) trading significantly higher than '0' (39c). This suggests a 'Gambler's Fallacy' bias, where traders incorrectly assume an eruption is 'due' to meet the annual average, severely undervaluing the statistical likelihood of a quiet year.
Sign up to view more information
Exotics
This falls under niche scientific prediction markets. While not as mainstream as politics or sports, 'disaster prediction' is a classic vertical in prediction markets. The general public understands the concept, but lacks the professional statistical intuition for it.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Statistical models (Poisson) strongly indicate '0 eruptions' as the dominant outcome (>50%) given the lack of activity by mid-March. However, prediction market prices imply '1 eruption' (48c) is significantly more likely than '0' (39c). This divergence stems from human intuition struggling with small-sample randomness; traders are anchoring to the historical average (~0.7/year) and overestimating the probability of an event 'catching up' in the remaining months.
