All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.12 13:01 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Although the headline price shows 31.5c, the underlying trade data indicates a crash to 11c on March 11, reflecting the core logic of 'time decay'. With only 18 days left until the March 31 deadline, FIFA's stance remains 'monitoring' rather than acting. FIFA's bureaucratic process is notoriously slow; unless the US State Department issues a public visa denial (forced intervention), the probability of FIFA completing an investigation, passing a council vote, and officially announcing a ban within two weeks is extremely low. The early panic premium (39c) is being corrected by the reality that 'no news is bad news', suggesting fair value is significantly below the current rebound price.
Sign up to view more information
Exotics
While expelling a national team from the World Cup is not unprecedented (e.g., Russia in 2022), it is a relatively extreme sports diplomacy event absent a full-scale war. Combining geopolitics and sports makes it a moderately unconventional topic.
Hedging
Crude Oil
This event is not just about soccer; it serves as a barometer for geopolitical tension. If Iran is banned, it is likely due to a significant escalation in military conflict (as hinted by the 'US military strikes' context), which would cause crude oil supply fears and spike prices significantly. Gold would benefit as a safe haven, while equities might suffer from increased geopolitical risk premiums.
Movers
March 11, 2026 - March 12, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' rebounded from 11c to 31.5c (current quote), driven by speculative dip-buying or liquidity resets following the crash, despite deteriorating fundamentals.
March 6, 2026 - March 11, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' collapsed from 38c to 11c, as the initial panic following US strikes faded and the lack of substantive action from FIFA led the market to lose confidence in a ban occurring before the March 31 deadline.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Mainstream media reports on 'US strikes' and FIFA 'monitoring' tend to fuel public perception that Iran's removal is imminent or highly likely (>50%). However, the prediction market's recent dip to 11c suggests sophisticated traders understand FIFA's tendency for political inertia and delay, absent absolute force majeure (like a formal declaration of war or host nation visa denial). The market pricing is far more cynical and realistic than the sensationalist headlines suggest.
