All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Nate Morris
YesNo
Andy Barr
YesNo
Andrew Shelley
YesNo
Wende Kennedy
YesNo
Mike Faris
YesNo
Daniel Cameron
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.17 10:20 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Andy Barr (62c) has solidified his dominance, holding a 10x cash advantage ($6.4M) over Cameron ($600k) and emerging from the March 16th debate as the clear 'electable' choice. While polls show Barr and Cameron neck-and-neck (approx. 24-28%), the prediction market correctly prices Cameron's insolvency as a fatal flaw (12c). Nate Morris (25c) remains overvalued at 32c; despite rumors of Elon Musk's backing and self-funding capacity, he polls consistently third (14-17%) with weak grassroots support. The market is overpaying for his 'wildcard' potential while ignoring the fundamental gap.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
Significant divergence exists, primarily regarding Daniel Cameron. Recent polling (e.g., Emerson Feb 5) shows Cameron statistically tied for the lead with ~21-27% support (vs Barr's 24-28%), yet the prediction market prices him at just 10c (implied 10% probability). This indicates the market is completely discounting current polling numbers in favor of forward-looking financial fundamentals, betting that Cameron's massive cash disadvantage (Barr $6M vs Cameron $0.6M) makes his campaign unsustainable.
