All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
LPL (China)
YesNo
LCK (South Korea)
YesNo
LEC (Europe / EMEA)
YesNo
LCS (North America)
YesNo
CBLOL (Brazil)
YesNo
LCP (Asia-Pacific)
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.04 03:43 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Given the extremely low trading volume ($36), current prices are heavily distorted. Historically, MSI titles are monopolized by LCK and LPL. While CBLOL (Brazil) and LCP (APAC) have large fanbases, their competitive strength is far from championship caliber, making their ~28% pricing absurdly overvalued (realistically <1%). LPL, as a primary contender, is undervalued at 25.5%. Fair value should be concentrated on the LCK/LPL duopoly.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
Severe divergence detected. The market implies CBLOL (Brazil) has a higher win probability (28.5%) than the LPL (China, 25.5%). This completely contradicts mainstream esports consensus, which ranks LPL as a top-tier contender and CBLOL as a minor region. This price inversion is a classic symptom of pricing failure due to lack of liquidity.