All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Shri Thanedar
YesNo
Donavan McKinney
YesNo
Anthony Carbonaro
YesNo
Nazmul Hassan
YesNo
Shelby Campbell
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.13 07:50 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Although the market prices the race as a toss-up (~43c vs 40c), fundamentals heavily favor incumbent Shri Thanedar. Thanedar commands a massive financial advantage (>$6.4M Cash on Hand in early 2026), whereas challenger McKinney operates in the $300k-$500k range—a 15-20x disparity. In this Detroit district, media buying power is decisive. While Adam Hollier's withdrawal (Feb) consolidated the anti-incumbent vote behind McKinney (endorsed by Justice Democrats), historical data suggests challengers rarely overcome such a funding chasm. The market is overreacting to McKinney's progressive momentum and underpricing the incumbent's 'cash + name ID' moat. Thanedar's fair win probability is likely closer to 70%.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Market pricing (43.5 vs 40.5) implies a 50/50 toss-up, which contradicts traditional political fundamentals. Typically, an incumbent with a 20x cash advantage ($6.4M vs $0.3M) is rated as 'Safe' or 'Likely' to win. The market appears to be overweighting the narrative momentum of the 'Justice Democrats' endorsement while ignoring the reality of expensive media warfare in the Detroit district.