All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Republican
YesNo
Democrat
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.14 20:30 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
The market currently exhibits severe pricing inefficiency. The sum of Democrat (62c) and Republican (18c) is only 80c, implying a 20% probability of an 'Independent/Third Party' victory. In modern US politics and Michigan's electoral history, the probability of an Independent (even Mike Duggan) actually 'winning' is extremely low; they act primarily as 'spoilers'. If Duggan runs and splits the Democratic vote, it mathematically skyrockets the Republican chance of winning under FPTP rules. Therefore, the Republican price of 18c is deeply undervalued (the floor for a swing state is typically ~40c), and the Democrat price also reflects a misallocation of probability toward the unlikely event of an Independent victory. Fair value should revert to the fundamentals of a binary two-party contest.
Sign up to view more information
Arbitrage|Low Risk
Arbitrage Plan:
Buy Yes Democrat (0.62) + Buy Yes Republican (0.18)
Plan Description:
This is a classic 'Fade the Third Party' strategy. The combined price of the two major parties is only 80c. By purchasing this combination, a trader profits 20c (25% ROI) as long as the winner is either a Democrat or a Republican, regardless of whether a spoiler candidate runs. The only risk is if an Independent (like Mike Duggan) not only runs but actually *wins* the election, rather than just spoiling it. Given the historical difficulty for Independents to win Governorships, this is a high-EV, low-risk bet.Sign up to view more information
Arbitrage: 20¢
|Annualized yield: 39.1%
Divergence
There is a massive divergence. Mainstream political analysis (e.g., Cook Political Report or Sabato's Crystal Ball) typically rates Michigan as a 'Toss-up' or 'Lean Dem.' Even accounting for spoiler factors, the Republican floor probability is usually between 35%-45%. However, the prediction market currently prices the Republican chance at only 18%, statistically implying they are nearly non-competitive in Michigan, which is severely disconnected from the state's political reality (where Trump won in 2016).
