All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
April 30
YesNo
March 31
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.15 02:59 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Current date is March 15, 2026. For 'March 31', with only 16 days remaining and the critical Tanking Test not yet commenced (which requires weeks of subsequent review and prep), a launch this month is physically impossible; fair value is 0-1c (liquidity floor). For 'April 30', the price has recovered to 66c from the panic dip to 59c. This reflects a market reaffirmation of the core fundamental: NASA has not announced a rollback to the VAB, implying the 'on-pad repair' strategy is still active. As long as there is no rollback, the late April window remains the primary target. While the lack of a firm test date adds risk, the passage of time eliminates earlier options, solidifying April as the only viable near-term target. Fair value is pegged at 65c, aligning with market price.
Sign up to view more information
Rule Risk
The rules for this market are extremely vague and confusing. The title is 'NASA Artemis II', but the options mix a catastrophic outcome ('Artemis II explodes?') with calendar dates ('April 30', 'March 31', 'February 28'). First, the dates lack a year (though implied) and context—do they signify launch, landing, or mission completion? Second, the relationship between the explosion option and the dates is unclear (e.g., if it explodes on Feb 28, which option wins?). Furthermore, Artemis II is a crewed lunar flyby with specific public schedules; random month-end dates do not resemble standard launch windows. This structure creates a high risk of resolution disputes.
Exotics
While Artemis II is a major mainstream aerospace topic, the specific construction of this prediction market is bizarre. It doesn't simply bet on 'success/failure' or 'launch date' but mixes a catastrophic tail risk ('explodes') with arbitrary month-end dates. This non-standard option setup makes it far more 'exotic' than a typical aerospace prediction market.
Hedging
BA
LMT
The core contractors for Artemis II include Boeing (SLS rocket core stage) and Lockheed Martin (Orion spacecraft). A catastrophic outcome like 'Explodes' would deliver a significant shock to Boeing (BA), whose space division is already under scrutiny, as a failure involving a crewed mission is devastating. Lockheed Martin (LMT) would also be implicated. Such a disaster represents a 'black swan' event with significant tradable value and hedging necessity. Mere schedule delays represented by the date options would have a lower impact.
