All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Arizona
YesNo
Kansas
YesNo
Michigan
YesNo
Houston
YesNo
UConn
YesNo
Queens
YesNo
Nebraska
YesNo
Michigan State
YesNo
Siena
YesNo
Lehigh
YesNo
Villanova
YesNo
BYU
YesNo
UCF
YesNo
TCU
YesNo
Virginia
YesNo
VCU
YesNo
Troy
YesNo
Gonzaga
YesNo
Saint Mary’s
YesNo
Miami (Ohio)
YesNo
Hawaii
YesNo
Missouri
YesNo
Miami (FL)
YesNo
Santa Clara
YesNo
UCLA
YesNo
Prairie View A&M
YesNo
Kennesaw State
YesNo
Illinois
YesNo
Ohio State
YesNo
Clemson
YesNo
Texas
YesNo
Florida
YesNo
Texas A&M
YesNo
Wright State
YesNo
Saint Louis
YesNo
Tennessee
YesNo
Iowa State
YesNo
Kentucky
YesNo
Vanderbilt
YesNo
Penn
YesNo
North Dakota State
YesNo
South Florida
YesNo
LIU
YesNo
Northern Iowa
YesNo
Utah State
YesNo
Purdue
YesNo
Alabama
YesNo
St. John’s
YesNo
Iowa
YesNo
Arkansas
YesNo
Texas Tech
YesNo
Louisville
YesNo
Furman
YesNo
High Point
YesNo
Akron
YesNo
McNeese
YesNo
Howard
YesNo
Hofstra
YesNo
Cal Baptist
YesNo
Duke
YesNo
North Carolina
YesNo
Georgia
YesNo
Wisconsin
YesNo
Tennessee State
YesNo
Idaho
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.14 15:48 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Current date is March 14, 2026 (eve of Selection Sunday). Based on simulated context, Michigan (30-2, Big Ten Champs) is the clear favorite, yet a 54.5% implied probability to reach the Final Four is historically excessive for any team (typically ~35-40% for strong #1 seeds). The market is severely broken/inefficient, with dozens of teams priced at a default 50%. Mid-to-low major teams like Queens (ASUN champs, projected 15/16 seed) or Siena have a near-zero probability of advancing. Fair values must reflect historical seed performance rather than the current flat 50/50 pricing.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
The sum of implied probabilities exceeds 3000% (60+ teams at 50%), whereas mathematically it must cap at 400% (4 spots). This massive aggregate premium indicates an illiquid market or irrational algorithm dominance, sharply diverging from the reality where only a handful of teams possess a >10% chance of advancing.