# of seats won by GS in Slovenian Parliamentary Election? - AI Odds Analysis
All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
<25
YesNo
25-29
YesNo
30-34
YesNo
40+
YesNo
35-39
YesNo
AI Insights:
10 hours ago UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
With only 3 days left until the March 22 election, and authoritative polls like Mediana consistently showing the Freedom Movement (GS) stagnating at 18-22% support (translating to approx. 16-20 seats), there is no fundamental shift to support them winning over 25 seats. The current market pricing is heavily distorted: '<25', the option most aligned with polling data, is severely undervalued (at 48c), while the impossible high-seat options (30+) still command a premium of ~24c. The fair value model maintains '<25' as the dominant outcome, with '25-29' as the sole tail-risk hedge, and all other options valuing near zero.
Sign up to view more information
Movers
March 17, 2026 - March 18, 2026, the price of '40+' plummeted from 16.9c to 1.2c before a weak rebound to 6.8c; '35-39' dropped from 12.5c to 4c. The reason is that the speculative bubble caused by previous illiquidity finally burst, forcing the market to face the reality of GS's low polling numbers, with capital fleeing high-risk, high-seat options.
March 16, 2026 - March 17, 2026, the '40+' option experienced a baffling 'dead cat bounce', surging from ~2.7c to 23c before settling. This extreme volatility suggested a liquidity crisis or irrational speculation, with capital incorrectly flowing into the least likely outcome.
March 15, 2026 - March 16, 2026, the '<25' option experienced significant turbulence, rising from 46.5c to 57c and then falling back to 48c, indicating a fierce tug-of-war among participants between 'trusting the polls' and 'betting on a black swan'.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Mainstream polls (e.g., Mediana) show GS support at ~20% (corresponding to <25 seats), yet the prediction market implied probability assigns a ~52% chance to GS winning >25 seats (sum of Yes options). Market pricing is clearly lagging behind fundamentals or excessively hedging against extremely rare polling errors.