All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Christine Drazan
YesNo
Chris Dudley
YesNo
Robert Neuman
YesNo
Danielle Bethell
YesNo
Chael Sonnen
YesNo
Ed Diehl
YesNo
Kyle Duyck
YesNo
Caleb Kintz
YesNo
Patrick Kopke-Hales
YesNo
David Medina
YesNo
Brad T. Peters
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.03 11:52 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
⚠️ CRITICAL RISK PERSISTS: Rules still state settlement based on 'Democratic Primary' while options are Republicans. If strictly enforced, all options could be worthless. Assuming resolution on GOP Primary: Christine Drazan (44.5c) is significantly undervalued. As the 2022 nominee who narrowly lost the general election, she possesses the strongest statewide donor network and name ID. Chris Dudley (26c) relies on vintage name recognition (2010 run) but lacks recent political machinery. Ed Diehl (28c) is a credible legislator, but the market is pricing him nearly as a peer to Drazan (28c vs 44.5c), ignoring her structural advantage as the presumptive frontrunner. The market is inefficiently fragmenting the win probability.
Sign up to view more information
Rule Risk
This is a critical rule failure. The market title specifies the 'Republican Primary Winner' and lists Republican-affiliated candidates (e.g., Christine Drazan), but the rule text explicitly states resolution will be based on the winner of the '**Democratic** Primary'. This complete mismatch between title/options and resolution criteria creates a fundamental contradiction, making the market impossible to resolve logically and highly prone to cancellation or dispute.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Current prices imply a tight 'three-way race' (Drazan 45% vs Diehl/Dudley combined ~54%). However, mainstream political analysis and historical precedence suggest Christine Drazan, as a strong recent nominee, should be a clear frontrunner (>50%). The market is placing an excessive premium on Diehl and Dudley, likely due to retail bias towards 'celebrity' (Dudley) and over-hedging against Drazan.
