All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
$200M
YesNo
$400M
YesNo
$3B
YesNo
$1B
YesNo
$2B
YesNo
$5B
YesNo
$7B
YesNo
$10B
YesNo
$800M
YesNo
AI Insights:
10 hours ago UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Market sentiment for StandX continues to deteriorate. Nearly six weeks have passed since the points campaign ended with no TGE timeline announced, causing community confidence to drain. The $200M option has dropped to 34c, reflecting a rising probability of 'No Launch by end of 2026' or a 'Very Low Valuation Launch.' Given DUSD's stablecoin market cap of ~$100M, if the project launches during a bear market or liquidity crunch, its FDV might only sustain 1.5-2x TVL ($150M-$200M), putting even the lowest strike ($200M) at significant risk. Additionally, the $3B option shows anomalous buying (7.75c), which contradicts fundamentals and is likely noise. Due to time decay and the team's continued silence, fair values are adjusted downward across the board.
Sign up to view more information
Exotics
This is a market specific to the valuation of a niche crypto project (StandX). While token FDV predictions are common within crypto circles, it is a relatively vertical and niche market for the general public. Compared to Bitcoin prices or election results, its audience is narrower, placing it in the upper-middle range of exoticism (or specialization).
Movers
On March 18, 2026, the price of the $3B option anomalously spiked from ~2.75c to 7.75c (+5c). This is highly likely a fat-finger error or irrational speculation by a single trader, as the lower strike price ($2B) did not rise correspondingly and is actually trading lower (6.4c), creating an illogical inversion.
From March 14, 2026, to March 18, 2026, the price of the $200M option continued its decline from 40.5c to 34c (-6.5c). While not a single-day drop exceeding 10c, it extends the downtrend that began in early March. The market is increasingly pricing in the risk of 'No Launch' for an extended period. As time passes, the cost of holding long positions rises, leading to a slow bleed of liquidity.
Divergence
Internal logical divergence exists. The option chain shows price inversion: the Yes price for $3B (7.75c) is higher than the Yes price for $2B (6.4c). This is a manifestation of market microstructure failure and does not represent a consensus view that the valuation will land in the impossible range of >3B but <2B. It also implies extremely poor market liquidity, where small capital can distort pricing.
