All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
YesNo
Fermin López
YesNo
Gabriel Martinelli
YesNo
Vitinha
YesNo
Michael Olise
YesNo
Julian Álvarez
YesNo
Marcus Rashford
YesNo
Anthony Gordon
YesNo
Harry Kane
YesNo
Dominik Szoboszlai
YesNo
Harvey Barnes
YesNo
Victor Osimhen
YesNo
Kylian Mbappé
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.15 09:36 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
The market is in a state of extreme irrational 'overheating,' with the sum of all 'Yes' prices reaching 190.75%, far exceeding the mathematical limit of 100%. This indicates panic buying following UCL matchdays (March 11-12), chasing players with recent high spikes (Olise, Rashford) without accounting for the mutually exclusive nature of the event. While Mbappé's price dropped due to poor performance or strong rivals, he remains the statistical favorite with a fair value of ~45%. Challengers like Olise and Kane are fairly valued around 15-18%. The prices for Rashford and Álvarez (20c+) represent a clear 'Recency Bias' bubble and should be significantly discounted.
Sign up to view more information
Rule Risk
There is a significant tie-breaker risk. The rule states that in the event of a tie without a declared official leader, the winner is determined alphabetically by last name. Since 'Goals + Assists' is a derived stat and not a primary UEFA award like the Golden Boot, UEFA may not provide an official tie-breaking ranking (e.g., based on minutes played) for this specific metric. This makes the arbitrary alphabetical resolution highly probable in a close race. Additionally, 'June 31' is a non-existent date.
Movers
From March 11, 2026, to March 12, 2026, Michael Olise's price surged from 12.0c to 34.2c, and Marcus Rashford's price skyrocketed from 3.5c to 20.85c, while Kylian Mbappé's price plunged from 59.5c to 38.0c. This massive volatility was driven by UCL matchday results, where Olise and Rashford likely delivered standout performances (multiple goals/assists) ensuring their teams' progression, while Mbappé likely blanked or faced a setback, causing a major market repricing.
Divergence
The market is significantly diverging from statistical reality. Current prices imply the existence of nearly 2 independent winners (191% total probability). In contrast, mainstream sports data models (e.g., Opta/538) typically show the top 5 candidates summing to 80-90% in a winner-takes-all market, with it being statistically impossible for 5 players to each have >20% probability. The high prices for Rashford and Álvarez show a marked divergence from their actual long-term probability of winning the goal contribution race.
