UEFA Europa Conference League: Most Goal Contributions - AI Odds Analysis
All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Daniel Adu-Adjei
YesNo
Ismaïla Sarr
YesNo
Luka Jovic
YesNo
Dereck Kutesa
YesNo
Martial Godo
YesNo
Álvaro García
YesNo
Carlo Holse
YesNo
Aboubakary Koita
YesNo
Isak Jensen
YesNo
Franko Kovacevic
YesNo
Taofeek Ismaheel
YesNo
Mikael Ishak
YesNo
Sven Mijnans
YesNo
Marius Mouandilmadji
YesNo
Luis Palma
YesNo
Lamine Diaby-Fadiga
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.17 08:22 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
The market pricing exhibits severe and absurd premiums, with the sum of 'Yes' prices exceeding 450%, whereas the theoretical sum should be 100%. This implies almost every option is massively overvalued. Based on previous tournament data, Marius Mouandilmadji (7 goals) and Sven Mijnans (5 goals) are the actual frontrunners. Isak Jensen's recent extreme volatility likely reflects new goal contributions, but his price of ~50 cents implies a 50% win probability, which is irrational in a multi-player field. Luka Jovic, previously confirmed to have negligible playing time and not being a top scorer, is priced at ~40 cents, completely detaching from fundamentals.
Sign up to view more information
Movers
March 16, 2026 - March 17, 2026: Isak Jensen's price retraced from 69.5c to 49.5c. Despite the 20c drop, it remains high, indicating significant market disagreement regarding his recent performance.
March 14, 2026 - March 16, 2026: Isak Jensen's price skyrocketed from 24.5c to 69.5c, a massive 45c surge. This typically indicates a hat-trick or multiple goal contributions in a very recent match, instantly making him a favorite.
March 16, 2026 - March 17, 2026: Martial Godo's price rebounded from 21.5c to 38.5c, a swing of nearly 20c, suggesting extremely low market liquidity where small capital causes violent jitters.
Divergence
The market displays an extreme 'summation fallacy' divergence. While this is a mutually exclusive event (only one winner), the top 8 players are all priced around 40 cents, leading to a total implied probability exceeding 400%. This is a complete departure from reality (where sum is 100%). This divergence suggests a lack of rational market makers to compress prices, or irrational retail/bot activity driving up all options via market orders in a low-liquidity environment.