All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.13 22:18 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Current date is March 13, 2026. Trump is scheduled to arrive in China on March 31, leaving only an ~18-day window for a 'Yes' resolution (Ceasefire before Visit). While Polymarket data shows the probability of a 'Ceasefire by March 31' has dropped from 45% in early March to 32.5%, reports indicate Beijing is 'frustrated' with the rushed planning, creating a tail risk that the visit is postponed. If the visit is delayed to April or May, the ceasefire window extends significantly (market sees 79% chance of ceasefire by June 30). Thus, Fair Value for 'Yes' includes a premium for potential visit delays, pricing it slightly above the raw 'March 31 Ceasefire' odds.
Sign up to view more information
Rule Risk
Significant rule risks exist: 1. Definition ambiguity. A 'ceasefire' logically presupposes active 'direct military engagement.' If the US and Iran are in a state of high tension/proxy conflict but not direct war, a diplomatic or nuclear deal might fail to qualify as a 'ceasefire' due to the lack of explicit clauses halting direct engagement. 2. Timeline conflict. The metadata 'Settlement Time' (2026-03-31) predates the '50-50 resolution' deadline (2026-06-30) in the rules, creating risks of premature settlement or extended capital lockup.
Hedging
Crude Oil
Gold
S&P 500
This event has a decisive impact on Crude Oil prices. A 'US-Iran Ceasefire' implies the immediate removal of a massive geopolitical risk premium, likely crashing oil prices; conversely, escalation spikes them. Additionally, Trump's visit to China implicates trade relations, directly influencing volatility in the S&P 500 and safe-haven assets like Gold.
Movers
March 3, 2026 - March 13, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' dropped from 45c to 32.5c. The reason is the intensifying US-Iran conflict (started Feb 28), with blocked transit in the Strait of Hormuz and no signs of de-escalation. As Trump's scheduled visit to China on March 31 approaches, the time window to achieve a ceasefire 'before the visit' is rapidly shrinking, eroding bullish sentiment.
Divergence
Moderate divergence exists. While the market price of 32.5c implies a reasonable chance of a ceasefire within two weeks, mainstream geopolitical analysis describes the conflict as 'intensifying' and only in its second week, suggesting a quick resolution is unlikely (<20% fundamentally). The market premium likely reflects expectations of Trump's 'deal-making' volatility or political pressure to force a truce specifically to facilitate the China trip.
