AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 5 hours ago
Top Undervalued
+29.5¢
(No)
US x Iran peace deal before Trump visits China? AI analysis: • +29.5¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
The probability of a permanent peace deal between the US and Iran is extremely low. The two nations ...
🔓 Log in to see more
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
YesNo
34.5¢
65.5¢
5¢
95¢
0¢
+29.5¢
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
This market carries moderate rule risk. First, the definition of a 'permanent peace deal' is highly strict and explicitly excludes temporary ceasefires, which can be ambiguous in real-world geopolitics. Second, the strict sequential condition (peace deal must precede the China visit) must be met. Lastly, there is a discrepancy between the listed settlement date (May 31, 2026) and the text's hard deadline (Dec 31, 2026), creating uncertainty around potential early resolution or extensions.
Exotics
This is a highly exotic market. It creates a parlay out of two completely unrelated major geopolitical events (a US-Iran peace deal and Trump visiting China) and gambles on their sequential timing. A typical person would not naturally link these two events for a forecast.
Hedging
Gold
Crude Oil
A permanent US-Iran peace deal would be a major geopolitical breakthrough, significantly erasing the war risk premium in the Middle East and causing Crude Oil prices to drop sharply. Meanwhile, cooling geopolitical fears would put downward pressure on Gold as a safe haven. For the S&P 500, lower geopolitical risk is generally a tailwind, though the overall impact would be moderate. The high sensitivity of Crude Oil makes this a significant hedging opportunity.
Divergence
The current 'Yes' price of 32.5%-34.5% in the prediction market implies a significant perceived likelihood of a permanent US-Iran peace deal in the near term. This sharply diverges from the consensus of mainstream geopolitical analysts, who consider the deep-seated hostilities between the US and Iran unresolvable in the foreseeable future, let alone through a formal peace treaty. This pricing is likely driven by speculation or a misunderstanding of the market's strict resolution criteria.