All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
December 31
YesNo
June 30
YesNo
March 31
YesNo
AI Insights:
6 hours ago UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
For the 'March 31' option, with only 13 days remaining and the MSCI February Quarterly Index Review already implemented, the probability of removal is negligible absent a 'black swan' event like delisting (FV < 1c). For 'June 30', which covers the May Semi-Annual Index Review (SAIR), while MSTR's status as a 'Bitcoin proxy' is debated, MSCI methodology favors continuity. Without new rules specifically targeting digital asset holding companies, a removal is unlikely, suggesting the 16c price holds ~4c of speculative premium (FV ~12c). For 'December 31', while long-term regulatory uncertainty exists, the 27c price implies a >25% probability of removal, which is overly pessimistic given historical stability (FV ~22c).
Sign up to view more information
Arbitrage|Low Risk
Arbitrage Plan:
Buy 'No March 31'
Plan Description:
While no direct risk-free arbitrage exists (Yes+No < 100), the 'No' side of the 'March 31' option is priced at 99.4c, offering a 0.6c profit in just 13 days absent an extreme event. Given the MSCI review period has passed, this yield implies very high certainty with an annualized return of ~17%, representing a strong low-risk cash management strategy.Sign up to view more information
Arbitrage: 1¢
|Annualized yield: 16.9%
Rule Risk
There is a format conflict between the title/options and the rules. The options list specific dates (Dec 31, Mar 31), but the rule text describes a binary 'Yes/No' resolution logic based on a specific deadline (March 31, 2026). If the market UI presents date buckets, it implies a question of 'when', but the text says 'resolves to Yes if removed... otherwise No'. This discrepancy creates confusion. Furthermore, MSCI rebalancing follows strict quarterly schedules; off-cycle removals are rare but possible, creating potential ambiguity around 'transfer' versus 'removal'.
Hedging
MSTR
This event is directly tied to MicroStrategy (MSTR). Being delisted from major MSCI indices (World/USA) would force passive index funds to liquidate their holdings, creating significant selling pressure on the stock (Score 4). Given MSTR's correlation with Bitcoin, a crash in MSTR could cause minor sentiment-based ripples in BTC prices (Score 2), but the primary tradable impact is on the stock itself.
Divergence
Prediction market pricing (~27% removal probability) is significantly higher than mainstream financial analyst expectations. The consensus view is that MSTR will remain in the index absent a change in MSCI methodology or a catastrophic Bitcoin crash affecting market cap eligibility. The market is pricing in an exaggerated 'tail risk' of sudden regulatory shifts.
