All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
YesNo
AI Insights:
03.06 10:31 UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Despite the extreme volatility on March 5 (price spiked to 53.5c), the subsequent rapid retracement (to 16.5c) indicates that the RSF failed to sustain a substantial offensive or that the spike was driven by rumors. The fundamentals remain unchanged: the SAF broke the siege and secured supply lines in early February, holding a defensive advantage. With only 24 days remaining, the probability of the RSF regrouping to capture a fortified city is minimal. The current market price of 16.5c largely reflects residual panic from recent volatility rather than a rational probability of military success.
Sign up to view more information
Exotics
This is a geopolitical prediction regarding a specific battle in the Sudanese civil war. While standard for analysts following African conflicts, it is a niche vertical for the general public, far less common than US elections or major sports events.
Movers
March 5, 2026 - March 6, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' skyrocketed from 6.5c to 53.5c before crashing back to 16.5c, likely due to unverified reports of an RSF assault or market manipulation, followed by a rapid sentiment correction due to lack of evidence of actual control.
February 9, 2026 - February 10, 2026, the price of Option_'Yes' declined slightly from 15.5c to 14c, as the market continued to digest the SAF's major victory in breaking the siege of Dilling.
Divergence
There is a significant divergence between the market price (~16.5%) and military fundamentals. Based on the reality that the SAF has broken the siege and controls supply lines, the probability of an RSF victory from a military analysis standpoint should be in the single digits (<10%). The current premium is a result of panic pricing following the anomalous volatility on March 5 and has not yet fully returned to rationality.
