AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 03.24 17:21
Top Undervalued
+20¢
<20(Yes)
+15.5¢
20-39(No)
+5.2¢
200+(No)
CZ # posts March 24 - March 31, 2026? AI analysis: • +20¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
Under the specific market rules (excluding replies), CZ's eligible post count is significantly lower...
Log in to see more
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
<20
YesNo
10¢
90¢
30¢
70¢
+20¢
0¢
20-39
YesNo
67.5¢
32.5¢
52¢
48¢
0¢
+15.5¢
Expand to view all 11 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
Medium risk. The resolution relies on a third-party tracker (polymarket.com xtracker) which may miss or misclassify tweets (especially regarding whether replies appear on the main feed). Additionally, the 'deleted posts' rule requiring survival for ~5 minutes introduces uncertainty in capture timing.
Exotics
Fairly exotic. This is a niche market concerning the social media posting frequency of a specific individual, unrelated to mainstream financial or political events, primarily appealing to the crypto community.
Movers
From Mar 23 to Mar 24, the price of '<20' surged from 17c to 35c, driven by a market correction after overselling, realizing that excluding replies makes a sub-20 weekly count plausible.
From Mar 21 to Mar 23, the price of '40-59' crashed from 40.5c to 10.5c as the market corrected the initial liquidity seeding (uniform pricing), acknowledging the low probability of high volume under these rules.
From Mar 21 to Mar 23, the price of '20-39' surged from 40.5c to 60.5c, establishing this range as the core consensus for fair value.
Divergence
Public Perception vs. Rules Divergence: The public perceives CZ as a high-frequency user (dozens of interactions daily), but 70-80% of these are replies. The market rules explicitly exclude replies, causing the countable volume to be far lower than public intuition. This 'rule-based bias' means casual observers might think the market is under-pricing volume, whereas the '20-39' range is statistically accurate.