Predicting the specific range of tweet counts for a government social media account in a given week is a classic hyper-niche and trivial novelty topic. Prior to seeing this market, the general public would never think about or track such obscure data.

April 28, 2026 - April 28, 2026, the price of the 180-199 option crashed from 58c to 32c, the 160-179 option dropped from 56c to 33c, and the 140-159 option fell from 51c to 26c, due to abnormal trades in an extremely illiquid market causing massive intraday volatility. April 25, 2026 - April 26, 2026, the price of the 140-159 option dropped from 38c to 22c, and the 160-179 option surged from 21.5c to 42.5c, as the White House posting frequency over the first two days significantly exceeded expectations, causing the market to upwardly revise the projected total. April 24, 2026 - April 24, 2026, the Yes price for the 100-119 option spiked from 4.8c to 17.65c, and the 160-179 option rose from 24c to 32.5c, due to small orders causing extreme volatility in a very low liquidity market.

High risk. The primary trap is the reliance on a specific third-party tracker (xtracker) and the rule that deleted posts only count if captured within ~5 minutes. Furthermore, the distinction between replies that appear on the main feed versus regular replies is ambiguous, which can lead to discrepancies between user perception and official resolution, causing disputes.

Highly exotic. Betting on the exact number of tweets a public figure will make in a designated week is a highly niche, entertainment-driven market. Ordinary people do not typically ponder or track this specific type of data.

April 27 - April 28, 2026, the price of the 240-259 option rebounded from 18.5c to 27.5c, as a slight acceleration in the tweet rate shifted the expected total range higher. April 26 - April 27, 2026, the price of the 220-239 option rose from 17c to 26.5c, as a steady tweet rate eliminated extreme volatility scenarios, driving capital into the mean target ranges. April 26 - April 27, 2026, the price of the 200-219 option surged from 9.5c back up to 19.5c, as a slight slowdown in weekend tweet rates led the market to price in the possibility of a slightly lower range. April 24 - April 26, 2026, the price of the 180-199 option plummeted from 15.75c to 2.05c, as updated tracking data showed a noticeable increase in posting frequency, making lower expected total ranges unlikely. April 21 - April 24, 2026, the price of the 180-199 option surged from 3.5c to 15.05c as early tracking data suggested the final count might fall into a lower-to-middle range, prompting market repricing.

This is a single-day, specific-city weather prediction market. While weather derivatives exist in professional spheres, the exact high temperature in Moscow on a random day is not something the general public naturally thinks about, making it somewhat niche.

The market relies heavily on a specific external tracker (xtracker) and has precise caveats for replies (only counted if on the main feed) and deleted posts (must survive ~5 minutes to be captured). Tracker downtime or scraping anomalies could cause discrepancies with manual profile counts.

Betting on the exact number of social media posts a politician makes in a specific week is a classic degenerate prop bet. The general public rarely wonders about this specific metric, making the market highly novel and entertainment-driven.

April 28, 2026, the 'Yes' prices of all mutually exclusive options (e.g., '100-119', '80-99', '60-79', '140-159', etc.) suddenly surged to around 50c. This was caused by a likely severe data feed error, API malfunction, or extreme liquidity drain leading to anomalous quoting, bringing the sum of implied probabilities for all mutually exclusive options well above 100%. April 27, 2026 - April 28, 2026, the price of '100-119' climbed from 22.5c to 34c, '80-99' climbed from 15.95c to 25.4c, and '120-139' fell back from 32.5c to 26c, as the posting rate further slowed over time, causing market expectations to continue their downward revision toward the 80-119 range. April 26, 2026 - April 27, 2026, the price of '80-99' surged from 15.45c to 37.65c, while '120-139' plummeted from 33.5c to 18c, as the latest posting frequency data fell short of expectations, leading the market to significantly lower its forecast to the 80-119 range. April 25, 2026 - April 26, 2026, '120-139' price surged from 30.5c to 50c then fell back to 34c, while '140-159' steadily dropped from 21.5c to 11.5c, as the initial stabilization of the posting pace further concentrated the market on the 100-139 range. April 24, 2026 - April 25, 2026, the price of '160-179' plummeted from 24c to 5c, as the posting pace failed to meet the expectations for this bracket over time, leading the market to drastically downgrade its probability. April 22, 2026 - April 24, 2026, '120-139' fluctuated from 24c up to 41.5c and back to 27c, while '140-159' rose from 22c to 35.5c before settling at 27c. This occurred as early posting data caused market expectations to swing wildly regarding a final tally between 120 and 160. April 21, 2026 - April 22, 2026, 'Yes' prices for lower-frequency brackets like '40-59' plummeted by over 15c. This was driven by the market rapidly pricing out the likelihood of unusually low posting volumes as the tracking period approached.

The current market prices exhibit an extremely severe internal logical divergence (the sum of probabilities for all mutually exclusive options is approaching 500%). This is not a divergence between fundamental expectations and media views, but rather a profound anomaly in the market's trading mechanics or data layer. Normal fundamental analysis suggests Trump's posting frequency points to the 80-119 range, whereas the current quotes are completely detached from any reasonable real-world expectations.

Predicting the exact highest temperature of a specific city (Wuhan) on a random future date is a typical niche weather market. The general public rarely considers or bets on such specific meteorological outcomes in everyday life.