AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 03.24 19:30
Top Undervalued
+28¢
<2(No)
+16¢
2–3(Yes)
+10¢
4–5(Yes)
How many ships will Iran successfully target by April 30? AI analysis: • +28¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
While the reported '5-day diplomatic pause' and '95% drop in Strait traffic' support a low count (<2...
Log in to see more
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
<2
YesNo
58¢
42¢
30¢
70¢
0¢
+28¢
2–3
YesNo
9¢
91¢
25¢
75¢
+16¢
0¢
Expand to view all 6 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
There is a significant rule trap. The title asks about 'Iran', but the rules strictly limit this to actions 'explicitly claimed by the Islamic Republic of Iran' or 'confirmed to have originated from Iranian territory'. This excludes the vast majority of attacks typically attributed to 'Iranian proxies' (e.g., Houthis, Hezbollah). Since Iran typically operates through proxies and rarely strikes commercial vessels directly from its soil, the count is likely to be zero or very low unless total war breaks out, creating a huge discrepancy with the intuitive understanding of 'Iranian attacks' (which often implies Houthi actions).
Exotics
This is a relatively niche geopolitical market. While Middle East tensions are a hot topic, betting on the specific count of attacks 'launched directly from Iranian soil' is esoteric, especially given the common confusion with proxy attacks. It predicts a specific military escalation scenario rather than a general knowledge question.
Hedging
Crude Oil
Gold
The core of this market is 'Will Iran directly enter the war?'. If the resolution count is high (meaning Iran directly attacks commercial vessels from its soil multiple times), it implies an imminent blockade of the Strait of Hormuz or direct US-Iran conflict. This would cause an immediate, structural shock to Crude Oil prices (Score 5) and boost Gold as a safe haven. Such direct conflict represents an extreme tail risk event with massive implications for energy markets.
Divergence
The market is heavily skewed towards '<2' (70c), implying de-escalation or lack of targets. However, mainstream media emphasizes 'full-scale war', 'de facto closure of Strait of Hormuz', and 'inevitable attacks'. The price likely reflects a short-term diplomatic pause or broken liquidity, while news reflects ongoing war risk.