AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 11 hours ago
Top Undervalued
+8¢
April 1(Yes)
+8¢
April 3(Yes)
+8¢
April 7(Yes)
Iran military action against a Gulf State on...? AI analysis: • +8¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
Based on the simulated reality of March 25, 2026: The 'Operation Epic Fury' war has been active sinc...
Log in to see more
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
April 1
YesNo
50¢
50¢
58¢
42¢
+8¢
0¢
April 3
YesNo
50¢
50¢
58¢
42¢
+8¢
0¢
Expand to view all 10 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
There is a significant deviation between the title and the strict definitions in the rules. While the title implies general 'military action', the rules explicitly exclude the most common forms of aggression in the region: 1) Proxy attacks (e.g., Houthis, Hezbollah) do not count; 2) Intercepted missiles/drones do not count (must have ground impact); 3) Strikes not confirmed to originate from Iran or claimed by Iran do not count. Bettors risk misinterpreting proxy or intercepted attacks as qualifying events.
Hedging
Crude Oil
US 10Y Yield
Gold
S&P 500
A 'Yes' resolution (direct Iranian strike on Gulf soil) would signify a major escalation of war, directly threatening a global energy supply hub. Crude Oil prices would face an extreme structural shock (Score 5) due to supply fears. Gold would rise significantly as a safe haven. Equities typically sell off in risk-aversion from such geopolitical shocks. This is a high-macro-correlation 'Black Swan' type event.
Divergence
Market prices (~50%) imply a high chance of ceasefire or perfect interception. However, mainstream reporting (AP, ISW) confirms Iran denies talks and maintains high-tempo daily attacks, and rules count 'open space impacts' as Yes. The market is overly optimistic about peace, diverging from battlefield reality (high frequency attacks, inevitable defense leakage).