AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 03.24 18:37
Top Undervalued
+35¢
April 6(No)
+32.5¢
April 4(No)
+32¢
April 5(No)
Iran military action against Israel on...? AI analysis: • +35¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
The conflict (as of March 24, 2026) is high-intensity, with confirmed direct Iranian missile impacts...
Log in to see more
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
April 6
YesNo
89¢
11¢
54¢
46¢
0¢
+35¢
April 4
YesNo
87.5¢
12.5¢
55¢
45¢
0¢
+32.5¢
Expand to view all 9 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
There is a significant 'interception trap' in the rules. Note that initiating an attack is not sufficient for a 'Yes'; the rules explicitly state that intercepted missiles or drones (even if debris causes damage) do not count. Given Israel's high interception rates (Iron Dome, Arrow), even a massive barrage could resolve to 'No' if no projectiles directly impact the ground intact. Additionally, the distinction between direct Iranian military action (counts) and proxy attacks by Hezbollah/Houthis (does not count) is critical.
Hedging
Crude Oil
RTX
Gold
S&P 500
Bitcoin
If this event resolves to 'Yes', it implies a direct military strike by Iran on Israeli soil that bypasses defenses, marking a severe geopolitical escalation potentially leading to regional war. This would cause a structural shock to Crude Oil prices due to fears of a Strait of Hormuz blockade (Score 5), a surge in Gold as a safe haven, and panic selling in risk assets like the S&P 500. Defense contractors (e.g., RTX) would likely see increased demand.
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Mainstream media (Reuters, Israeli outlets) confirm a 'direct hit' on a Tel Aviv building by Iranian missiles on March 24, and Israeli officials deem a ceasefire 'unlikely'. However, market prices (especially ~40% after April 4) imply participants are heavily pricing in a ceasefire or '100% interception' scenario. The market fails to fully reflect the reality of ongoing daily strikes and permeable defenses.