All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Boston Celtics
YesNo
Denver Nuggets
YesNo
San Antonio Spurs
YesNo
Oklahoma City Thunder
YesNo
Los Angeles Clippers
YesNo
Milwaukee Bucks
YesNo
Minnesota Timberwolves
YesNo
Los Angeles Lakers
YesNo
Charlotte Hornets
YesNo
Toronto Raptors
YesNo
Orlando Magic
YesNo
Philadelphia 76ers
YesNo
Atlanta Hawks
YesNo
Phoenix Suns
YesNo
New York Knicks
YesNo
Golden State Warriors
YesNo
Portland Trail Blazers
YesNo
Detroit Pistons
YesNo
New Orleans Pelicans
YesNo
Chicago Bulls
YesNo
Cleveland Cavaliers
YesNo
Memphis Grizzlies
YesNo
Houston Rockets
YesNo
Miami Heat
YesNo
Utah Jazz
YesNo
Dallas Mavericks
YesNo
AI Insights:
6 hours ago UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
Based on the comparison between current market prices and team fundamentals, the assessment that OKC is undervalued is maintained. 1. Oklahoma City Thunder (37.5c), as defending champions with the league's best record, are in a tier of their own; their fair value should be around 40c. 2. Boston Celtics (11.05c) have seen their price dip further; given their playoff experience and core health, they are in deep value territory, with fair value maintained around 17c. 3. San Antonio Spurs (13.4c), despite Wembanyama's brilliance, carry a high speculative premium in their championship odds (ranking 2nd only to OKC); their actual probability should be lower than Boston and Denver. 4. Denver Nuggets (8.5c) are severely undervalued; single-digit pricing for a team led by Jokic is inconsistent with their status as top-tier contenders. 5. Detroit Pistons (5.25c), as the dark horse of the East, have seen prices normalize to a rational level.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
Significant divergence exists. Mainstream sportsbooks typically assign higher implied probabilities to the Boston Celtics and Denver Nuggets than the current prediction market does (Celtics often around +500/~16%, Nuggets +750/~12%, vs market prices of 11c and 8.5c). Conversely, the San Antonio Spurs ranking second in the prediction market (13.4c) is an outlier compared to traditional odds, highlighting a disconnect between market users' extreme bullishness on Wembanyama and institutional bookmakers' more conservative assessment of the team's overall depth.
