All
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Gretchen Whitmer
YesNo
Kamala Harris
YesNo
Pete Buttigieg
YesNo
Josh Shapiro
YesNo
Gavin Newsom
YesNo
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
YesNo
Wes Moore
YesNo
James Talarico
YesNo
Roy Cooper
YesNo
Mark Kelly
YesNo
Andy Beshear
YesNo
Jon Stewart
YesNo
Stephen A. Smith
YesNo
Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson
YesNo
Zohran Mamdani
YesNo
Liz Cheney
YesNo
MrBeast
YesNo
LeBron James
YesNo
Kim Kardashian
YesNo
Andrew Yang
YesNo
Chelsea Clinton
YesNo
Barack Obama
YesNo
Beto O’Rourke
YesNo
Hunter Biden
YesNo
Hillary Clinton
YesNo
Jasmine Crockett
YesNo
Oprah Winfrey
YesNo
Bernie Sanders
YesNo
George Clooney
YesNo
Raphael Warnock
YesNo
Jon Ossoff
YesNo
J.B. Pritzker
YesNo
Tim Walz
YesNo
Jared Polis
YesNo
Michelle Obama
YesNo
Rahm Emanuel
YesNo
Ruben Gallego
YesNo
John Fetterman
YesNo
Ro Khanna
YesNo
Mark Cuban
YesNo
Phil Murphy
YesNo
Cory Booker
YesNo
Chris Murphy
YesNo
Gina Raimondo
YesNo
AI Insights:
4 hours ago UpdatedFair Value Reasoning:
The market continues to exhibit severe 'cognitive bias'. 1. **Massive Governor Undervaluation**: Prices for Gretchen Whitmer (1.5c) and Josh Shapiro (4.0c) are completely disconnected from their actual standing. As successful governors of key swing states, they are the logical 'establishment' picks for 2028; their fair value should be around 10c. 2. **The AOC Premium**: AOC's price (8.4c) reflects social media engagement rather than national primary viability; her ceiling is limited by electability concerns in swing states. 3. **Harris Oversold**: While Kamala Harris (5.1c) carries baggage, her fundraising network and name ID as a former VP/Nominee dictate she should be a top-tier contender (10c+). Trading below Jon Ossoff is irrational.
Sign up to view more information
Divergence
There is a massive divergence between the prediction market and political reality. Mainstream political analysis typically views Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro, and Wes Moore as core future leaders of the Democratic Party. However, in this market, their combined price (~7c) is less than AOC alone (8.4c). The market heavily overvalues online celebrity (Newsom, AOC, Talarico) while ignoring traditional party advancement pathways and swing-state electability logic.